Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

R (on the application of St Matthews (West) and others) v HMRC

Retrospective legislation and ECHR

In R (on the application of St Matthews (West) and others) v HMRC ([2014] EWHC 1848 (Admin)– 6 June 2014) the claimants’ application for judicial review of provisions which had retrospective effect failed.

The taxpayers had implemented an SDLT avoidance scheme and sought judicial review of FA 2013 s 194(1)(a) (2) which amended FA 2003 s 45 with retrospective effect so that SDLT was chargeable on transactions implementing the scheme.

The court noted that in the event of several subsequent subsales the aim of s 45 was to place the taxation burden on the person who would have the use and enjoyment of the property.

The court observed that HMRC had become aware of the scheme thanks to the disclosure of tax avoidance scheme (DOTAS) and that HMRC had moved quickly to ensure that legislation would be passed with retrospective effect to...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top