Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Reed Employment v HMRC

Salary sacrifice arrangements did not work

In Reed Employment v HMRC (FTC/34/2012 – 9 April 2014) the UT confirmed the decision of the FTT that salary sacrifice arrangements implemented by Reed to avoid income tax and NIC liabilities totalling £158m were not effective.

The decision concerned Reed’s employment business which supplied temporary workers (that were employees of Reed) to clients. Reed had implemented a scheme whereby travel expenses were paid to employees under separate contractual arrangements. This was done on the basis of advice that the payment of travel expenses was subject to PAYE and NICs only under ITEPA 2003 s 72 and deductible under ITEPA2003 s 338.

The UT noted that the key to determining whether Reed’s employees had made an effective salary sacrifice was to ascertain the true construction of the contractual arrangements. Heaton v Bell [1970] AC 728 was authority for the proposition that ‘a...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top