Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Sippchoice: the meaning of ‘contributions paid’

Matthew Harrison (Withers) examines the Upper Tribunal decision concerning the registered pension scheme regime.

An individual is entitled to tax relief under FA 2004 s 188(1) in respect of contributions ‘paid’ to a registered pension scheme. The transfer of an asset (for nil consideration) is undoubtedly a ‘contribution’ but is it a contribution ‘paid’? If not does it make any difference if the asset is transferred to discharge a pre-existing money debt? I will suggest below that it does make a difference and the Upper Tribunal (UT) was wrong in HMRC v Sippchoice Ltd [2020] UKUT 149 to hold otherwise. To distinguish the two types of in specie contribution I refer to the former as ‘asset contributions’ and the latter as ‘discharge contributions’.

The background to the case

The facts in Sippchoice can be simply stated. An individual agreed to contribute £68 324 to a SIPP...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top