The juggernaut case of Skattenforvaltningen (the Danish Customs and Tax Administration) v Solo Capital Partners & others [2021] EWHC 974 (Comm) (‘the proceedings’) came to an abrupt halt in April of this year courtesy of Dicey’s ‘rule 3’.
Dicey’s rule 3 also known as the revenue rule in respect of tax matters prevents a sovereign state from suing in a foreign court for taxes owed to it.
The background to the Danish tax authority’s High Court litigation was the high profile cum ex scandal which has caused outrage on the continent. Cum ex was a trading strategy based on selling shares and claiming...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The juggernaut case of Skattenforvaltningen (the Danish Customs and Tax Administration) v Solo Capital Partners & others [2021] EWHC 974 (Comm) (‘the proceedings’) came to an abrupt halt in April of this year courtesy of Dicey’s ‘rule 3’.
Dicey’s rule 3 also known as the revenue rule in respect of tax matters prevents a sovereign state from suing in a foreign court for taxes owed to it.
The background to the Danish tax authority’s High Court litigation was the high profile cum ex scandal which has caused outrage on the continent. Cum ex was a trading strategy based on selling shares and claiming...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: