James Wilson believes that the Court of Appeal decision in FCE Bank represents a nail in the coffin of HMRC's argument that the ‘link company’ consortium relief rules do not conflict with the UK's double tax treaties
The recent Court of Appeal decision in FCE Bank represents another nail in the coffin of HMRC's argument that the ‘link company’ rules in the consortium relief legislation do not conflict with the UK's double tax treaties.
In HMRC v FCE Bank PLC [2012] EWCA Civ 1290 HMRC unsuccessfully appealed against the decision of the Upper Tribunal that the UK's group relief rules as they applied in 1994 contravened article 24 (the non-discrimination article) of the US/UK double tax treaty. Under the group relief rules then applicable the ‘group’...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
James Wilson believes that the Court of Appeal decision in FCE Bank represents a nail in the coffin of HMRC's argument that the ‘link company’ consortium relief rules do not conflict with the UK's double tax treaties
The recent Court of Appeal decision in FCE Bank represents another nail in the coffin of HMRC's argument that the ‘link company’ rules in the consortium relief legislation do not conflict with the UK's double tax treaties.
In HMRC v FCE Bank PLC [2012] EWCA Civ 1290 HMRC unsuccessfully appealed against the decision of the Upper Tribunal that the UK's group relief rules as they applied in 1994 contravened article 24 (the non-discrimination article) of the US/UK double tax treaty. Under the group relief rules then applicable the ‘group’...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: