The rise of the digital economy has given rise to calls for additional taxes on digitalised businesses which are able to access markets without having a local physical presence. At the same time US states have been trying to collect taxes from businesses without a physical presence in that state culminating in the recent US Supreme Court case of South Dakota v Wayfair Inc. (2018) 585 US (see ‘Wayfair: signposting a fairer way for global taxation?’ (Michael Cullers & Robert O’Hare) Tax Journal 20 July 2018).
The decision in Wayfair has overturned a constitutional principle established under National Bellas Hess Inc. v Department of Revenue of Illinois (1967) 386 US 753 (Bellas Hess)...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The rise of the digital economy has given rise to calls for additional taxes on digitalised businesses which are able to access markets without having a local physical presence. At the same time US states have been trying to collect taxes from businesses without a physical presence in that state culminating in the recent US Supreme Court case of South Dakota v Wayfair Inc. (2018) 585 US (see ‘Wayfair: signposting a fairer way for global taxation?’ (Michael Cullers & Robert O’Hare) Tax Journal 20 July 2018).
The decision in Wayfair has overturned a constitutional principle established under National Bellas Hess Inc. v Department of Revenue of Illinois (1967) 386 US 753 (Bellas Hess)...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: