We have become used to seeing the requirement to consider the ‘economic reality’ set out in VAT judgments. Setting aside what it actually means this exhortation is often a prelude to the finding that some more or less contrived arrangement on the part of the taxpayer is ineffective for VAT purposes. Colin Bishopp’s judgment in Tesco Freetime and another v HMRC [2017] UKFTT 614 (reported in Tax Journal 8 August 2017) is an excellent example of a case in which HMRC’s argument of form over substance – to our way of thinking at least unjustified and utterly formalistic – received short shrift from a court considering the economic reality.
The manner...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
We have become used to seeing the requirement to consider the ‘economic reality’ set out in VAT judgments. Setting aside what it actually means this exhortation is often a prelude to the finding that some more or less contrived arrangement on the part of the taxpayer is ineffective for VAT purposes. Colin Bishopp’s judgment in Tesco Freetime and another v HMRC [2017] UKFTT 614 (reported in Tax Journal 8 August 2017) is an excellent example of a case in which HMRC’s argument of form over substance – to our way of thinking at least unjustified and utterly formalistic – received short shrift from a court considering the economic reality.
The manner...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: