In Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation and others v HMRC [2020] UKSC 47 (20 November 2020) the Supreme Court has unanimously allowed the appeal albeit for different reasons. The court has confirmed that s 32(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1980 applies to claims for the restitution of money paid under a mistake of law. But in a departure from settled case law it has ruled that time begins to run from when the claimant could have recognised that it had a worthwhile claim not from when the true state of the law was established by a decision of a court of final jurisdiction.
The Supreme Court’s decision allows HMRC’s appeal in relation to long-running proceedings associated with the franked investment income (FII) group litigation (known as FIIGLO).
The test claimants...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation and others v HMRC [2020] UKSC 47 (20 November 2020) the Supreme Court has unanimously allowed the appeal albeit for different reasons. The court has confirmed that s 32(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1980 applies to claims for the restitution of money paid under a mistake of law. But in a departure from settled case law it has ruled that time begins to run from when the claimant could have recognised that it had a worthwhile claim not from when the true state of the law was established by a decision of a court of final jurisdiction.
The Supreme Court’s decision allows HMRC’s appeal in relation to long-running proceedings associated with the franked investment income (FII) group litigation (known as FIIGLO).
The test claimants...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: