A former chancellor was ostensibly forced to resign because some bloke called Dan Neidle of Tax Policy Associates (no never heard of him either) was curious as to the involvement of an offshore trust in the disposal of £25m worth of shares. The main takeaway? Don’t mess with someone who finds threatening letters incorrectly labelled as ‘confidential’ more tickle than SLAPP. Thank goodness nobody will make that mistake again.
A rose by any other name will still smell as sweet. And so too as we learned in Sexton and another [2023] UKFTT 73 (TC) the right to use ‘bare land’ will still be considered the right to...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
A former chancellor was ostensibly forced to resign because some bloke called Dan Neidle of Tax Policy Associates (no never heard of him either) was curious as to the involvement of an offshore trust in the disposal of £25m worth of shares. The main takeaway? Don’t mess with someone who finds threatening letters incorrectly labelled as ‘confidential’ more tickle than SLAPP. Thank goodness nobody will make that mistake again.
A rose by any other name will still smell as sweet. And so too as we learned in Sexton and another [2023] UKFTT 73 (TC) the right to use ‘bare land’ will still be considered the right to...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: