When I finally put down my dog-eared copy of the last instance decision in MCashback, my office screamed the same eerie silence that had greeted Ronaldinho's freak goal in 2002 to end the nation's World Cup hopes.
When I finally put down my dog-eared copy of the last instance decision in MCashback my office screamed the same eerie silence that had greeted Ronaldinho's freak goal in 2002 to end the nation's World Cup hopes.
The Supreme Court's decision just like the Ronaldinho ‘wonder goal’ (fluke) had left me in anti-climax and deflated – ‘is that really how it ends?’ I thought.
It later dawned on me that there was one big difference between the two – the goal stood even though it ought really to have been disallowed (out of some sense of ‘fair play’ or some over-arching unwritten rule that one does not score...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
Home >Articles > Tower M-post-tax: why the LLP ought not to have failed
Tower M-post-tax: why the LLP ought not to have failed
When I finally put down my dog-eared copy of the last instance decision in MCashback, my office screamed the same eerie silence that had greeted Ronaldinho's freak goal in 2002 to end the nation's World Cup hopes.
When I finally put down my dog-eared copy of the last instance decision in MCashback my office screamed the same eerie silence that had greeted Ronaldinho's freak goal in 2002 to end the nation's World Cup hopes.
The Supreme Court's decision just like the Ronaldinho ‘wonder goal’ (fluke) had left me in anti-climax and deflated – ‘is that really how it ends?’ I thought.
It later dawned on me that there was one big difference between the two – the goal stood even though it ought really to have been disallowed (out of some sense of ‘fair play’ or some over-arching unwritten rule that one does not score...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
