Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

VAT abuse following Hilden Park

Amanda Brown (KPMG) examines Hilden Park and the scope of the abuse test following the Upper Tribunal’s judgment.
 
Quietly posed as an orthodox application of the VAT ‘abuse of law’ test as established by the European Court in Halifax v CCE [2006] STC 919 the Upper Tribunal (UT) in Julian and Beryl Massey and Hilden Park LLP v HMRC [2015] UKUT 0405 TCC (reported in Tax Journal 7 August 2015) ostensibly extends the scope of the abuse test to apply to transactions which fail to create the purported tax advantage under the relevant legislation. However on a close reading of Hilden Park is that really what the UT is saying? Does it in fact intend to extend the scope of abuse to apply even where the intended transaction...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top