The Supreme Court of the United States (the court) handed down its decision in South Dakota v Wayfair Inc. (2018) 585 US (Wayfair) on 21 June 2018.
Wayfair concerned a challenge to a South Dakota law requiring a retailer which has no physical presence in the state to collect sales tax from its South Dakota consumers ‘as if the seller had a physical presence in the State’. In the absence of the law South Dakota would have had to rely on its resident consumers paying the tax on purchases from out-of-state sellers themselves. As the court noted compliance rates were unsurprisingly low.
The law however appeared to flout a constitutional principle that a state may not...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The Supreme Court of the United States (the court) handed down its decision in South Dakota v Wayfair Inc. (2018) 585 US (Wayfair) on 21 June 2018.
Wayfair concerned a challenge to a South Dakota law requiring a retailer which has no physical presence in the state to collect sales tax from its South Dakota consumers ‘as if the seller had a physical presence in the State’. In the absence of the law South Dakota would have had to rely on its resident consumers paying the tax on purchases from out-of-state sellers themselves. As the court noted compliance rates were unsurprisingly low.
The law however appeared to flout a constitutional principle that a state may not...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: