The Advocate General’s recent opinion in Re A Oy, if followed by the CJEU, could be of great value to the UK private aviation industry.
VATA 1994 Sch 8 Group 8 Note (1A) originally defined ‘qualifying aircraft’ as having a weight of not less than 8 000kg and ‘not designed or adapted for use for recreation or pleasure’. On 1 January 2011 the definition was aligned with that in Article 148(e) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC as an aircraft ‘used by an airline operating for reward chiefly on international routes’ (and certain other aircraft used by a ‘State Institution’). The old rule had made the UK a very attractive location within the EU for registration and holding of aircraft. Purely on the basis of...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The Advocate General’s recent opinion in Re A Oy, if followed by the CJEU, could be of great value to the UK private aviation industry.
VATA 1994 Sch 8 Group 8 Note (1A) originally defined ‘qualifying aircraft’ as having a weight of not less than 8 000kg and ‘not designed or adapted for use for recreation or pleasure’. On 1 January 2011 the definition was aligned with that in Article 148(e) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC as an aircraft ‘used by an airline operating for reward chiefly on international routes’ (and certain other aircraft used by a ‘State Institution’). The old rule had made the UK a very attractive location within the EU for registration and holding of aircraft. Purely on the basis of...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: