Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
VAT
Home
VAT
VAT
Is direct effect in VAT still alive in 2024?
Fabian Barth
Fabian Barth (Alvarez & Marsal) challenges HMRC’s view that direct effect
ceased to exist in VAT from 1 January 2024.
Tax and the City review for October 2024
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane
The latest developments that matter, reviewed by Mike Lane and
Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
The VAT review for October 2024
Jo Crookshank
Gary Barnett
This month’s review by Jo Crookshank and Gary Barnett (Simmons &
Simmons) covers cases concerning payments to acquire ‘credits’, VAT groups
and pension funds.
Go City: end of the road for ‘protective assessments’?
Bryn Reynolds
A recent FTT decision provides a startling level of insight into HMRC’s
decision making process, writes Bryn Reynolds (Pinsent Masons).
The emergence of a ‘new’ fixed establishment threshold for VAT grouping: insights from Barclays
Philippe Gamito
Although the FTT’s recent decision in Barclays is disappointing news, there are some positives, writes Philippe Gamito (Baker McKenzie).
Lycamobile: can phone bundles lead to VAT blunders?
Giles Salmond
Giles Salmond (Stewarts) examines an FTT decision covering a variety of
VAT issues, including the time of supply, the voucher rules and the use and
enjoyment provisions.
The VAT review for September 2024
Jo Crookshank
Gary Barnett
Jo Crookshank and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) examine the latest VAT decisions and the technical note on the extension of VAT to private school fees.
CCLA: AIFs can qualify for the SIF VAT exemption
Lauren Redhead
Clara Boyd
Clara Boyd and Lauren Redhead (DLA Piper) review the implications of the
FTT decision in
CCLA Investment Management Ltd
.
VAT on private school fees: 10 takeaways
Etienne Wong
Etienne Wong (Old Square Tax Chambers) provides a guide to the key points
from the Labour government’s introduction of VAT on private school fees.
‘Golden bricks’: when does construction really begin for VAT purposes?
Michael Ridsdale
Richard Dalton
Richard Dalton (BDO) and Michael Ridsdale (Wedlake Bell) challenge the
orthodox view that a dwelling is regarded as being constructed for VAT purposes
when it has reached ‘golden brick’.
Go to page
of
247
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
1 /7
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
2 /7
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
3 /7
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
4 /7
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
5 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
6 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 6 February 2026
Finance Bill measures risk uncertainty, complexity and unintended effects, CIOT warns
Finance Bill round-up
Net settlement and annual reporting requirements
Companies now required to maintain own register of members
CASES
Read all
FS Commercial Ltd v HMRC
P Kearney v HMRC
Mark Glenn Ltd v HMRC
J Hall v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 6 February 2026
IN BRIEF
Read all
Concerns over the scope of new conduct rules for advisers
Revenue fraud
The new share for share anti-avoidance
Value on death: IHT
TSI Instruments and import VAT recovery
MOST READ
Read all
M Holden v HMRC and HMRC v The Boston Consulting Group UK LLP and others
COP 9 and serious tax fraud: HMRC’s tougher approach
One minute with... Hayley Ives
Consultation tracker
Nimbus: The Disability Consultancy Service Ltd v HMRC