Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

LITIGATION


The UK has published draft regulations adopting an EU directive that promises faster resolution of double taxation disputes between member states.

In this quarterly review, Adam Craggs and Michelle Sloane (RPC) consider HMRC’s increasing propensity to seek the production of documents from accountants and other professional advisers, HMRC’s new policy of challenging taxpayers’ loan relationships, and the increase in the number of domicile enquiries launched by HMRC. 

David Pett (Temple Tax Chambers) argues that outstanding loan charges should be pursued both as a matter of law and social policy.
Sofia Casselbrant-Multala and Dominic Stuttaford (Norton Rose Fulbright) examine the Court of Appeal decision in Rossendale that demonstrates the potential general application of the Ramsay approach, but clearly shows its limits as a means of countering avoidance.
Some good news and some bad news.
Barrister Patrick Cannon (15 Old Square) provides first hand insight on when and how to use mediation to resolve tax disputes.

Adam Craggs and Constantine Christofi (RPC) consider the recent spate of IR35 cases that have been considered by the First-tier Tribunal, HMRC's increasing use of 'jeopardy amendments' and the increasing number of judicial review challenges being brought against HMRC.  

Sabina Margulies (Lexis®PSL Tax) reviews lessons from the Court of Appeal judgment.
Card image Jenny Tevlin Annis Lampard Morgan Harries
Despite little change in the primary law, HMRC's practice over its information powers is changing due to continued pressure to increase tax yield and demands for data from its international counterparts, as experts at Deloitte explain.
The 2019 loan charge teaches us that there is more to statutory time limits than the technical analysis, write Richard Jeens and Rose Swaffield (Slaughter and May). 
 
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top