Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

TAX POLICY ADMINISTRATION


Tom Wilde (Shoosmiths) examines an Upper Tribunal decision that raises some interesting points for EIS practitioners.
Adam Craggs and Dan Williams (RPC) provide a back to basics guide.
In an adversarial system, when can the tribunal take the initiative and reach decisions on arguments not made by counsel? Bridget Winters and Calum Young (Taylor Wessing) investigate.
Robert Waterson and Lucy Collins (Eversheds Sutherland) examine a recent High Court ruling that could encourage individuals to challenge HMRC if they feel their personal data rights are being infringed.
RBC reopens some old Ramsay uncertainties. Victoria Hine and Kyle Rainsford (Addleshaw Goddard) attempt to chart a course through.
Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison (Charles Russell Speechlys) consider the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment.
The January Barclays tech outage shines a light on the sometimes uncompromising interest and penalty regimes facing taxpayers which, in this context, demand flexibility, write Jessica Kemp and Catherine Hill (White & Case).
Gerald Montagu (Gide Loyrette Nouel) examines the First-tier Tribunal decision in Lloyds Asset Leasing Ltd.
Edd Thompson (Forvis Mazars) explores the Upper Tribunal’s approach to the principle of ‘consistent interpretation’ on the VAT charitable fundraising exemption and considers its potential relevance in the post-Brexit era.
Adam Craggs and Liam McKay (RPC) set out the general principles and the practical aspects of advancing a judicial review claim.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top